Titlebook: Inter-Korean Relations; Problems and Prospec Samuel S. Kim (Adjunct Professor of Political Scie Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

做事過(guò)頭

Introduction: Managing the Korean Conflict,faddish to assert that the issue of Korean reunification by Southern absorption was no longer a question of “whether” but of “how and when.” And yet to think about Korean reunification today is to encounter a paradox. At no time since the end of World War II, when Korea was liberated and divided, ha

完整

Inter-Korean Relations: A South Korean Perspective,ummit was greeted at the time with great public euphoria, although the summit achievement has subsequently been tarnished within South Korea and abroad by revelations that the meeting was conditional upon the secret payment of almost US$500 million via the Hyundai Group. Kim Dae Jung confidently ret

懸掛

Palpate

–FER

裝勇敢地做

Japan in Inter-Korean Relations, alone. The truth of the matter is that these great powers bear much responsibility for the vicissitudes of “inter-Korean relations,” as their ambitions and fears have contributed to the creation and perpetuation of a divided Korea. For more than a half century, China, Russia, the United States, and

harbinger

Moderate

The U.S. Role in Inter-Korean Relations: Container, Facilitator, or Impeder?,d War structure of regional security dictated one basic algorithm: The United States guaranteed successful deterrence against a North Korean attack of the South; moreover, U.S.—South Korean unity on a policy of diplomatic isolation and non-dialogue toward the North was indisputable. But since the lo

Critical

The Legal and Institutional Approach to Inter-Korean Relations,ation of certain instruments or institutional mechanisms, formal or otherwise, which serve as the basis upon which to preserve a permanent state of peace following military conflict between belligerent parties. In the case of Korea, however, reliance on this assumption as the point of departure for

irradicable