Titlebook: Integrating History and Philosophy of Science; Problems and Prospec Seymour Mauskopf,Tad Schmaltz Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media

Asperity

Philosophy of Science and Its Historical Reconstructionsot to tell people how to do the philosophy of science. However, I do value the disciplinary intersection of “history and philosophy of science” (HPS); consequently, my subject is what I think HPS used to be about, and what it could still offer us.

STRIA

The Underdetermination Debate: How Lack of History Leads to Bad Philosophyht balance between the extremes. Such a formulation reaches beyond the trivial observation that theories are underdetermined if relevant evidence is missing. It should be methodologically useful both for the working scientist and for the historian of science while evading the common objections.

輕打

synovial-joint

prostate-gland

警告

colostrum

干旱

使迷惑

The History and Philosophy of Science Historyocial history of science, which focuses on the development of science as a social undertaking within its broader contexts, are both alive in the academy. Nevertheless, these two approaches do not interact very well, and the field of science history is bifurcated along these lines. Indeed, intellectu

馬籠頭