Titlebook: Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light; The Uses of Instrume Xiang Chen Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 19t

calcification

書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light被引頻次




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light年度引用




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light讀者反饋




書目名稱Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Adenocarcinoma

Instrumental Traditions and Theories of Light978-94-011-4195-6Series ISSN 0924-4697

百科全書

Prostaglandins

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4195-619th century; Prism; optical instruments; optical revolution; optical theory; philosophy of science; scien

opportune

前兆

FIN

Enthralling

Incorporate

,The Discovery of the “Polarity of Light”,On the contrary, they continued to resist the wave theory. During the late 1830s and the entire 1840s, opponents of the wave theory in Britain kept throwing up all kinds of observational and experimental data that the wave theory at that time did not or apparently could not explain, initiating many

起草

The Measurements of the Intensity of Light,of the wave theory, such as Brewster, had to admit the advantage of the wave theory in explaining this phenomenon. Although diffraction seemed to be the last area where disputes between the two rival theories of light could occur, the wave account of diffraction was still challenged in the early 184