Titlebook: Induction, Physics and Ethics; Proceedings and Disc Paul Weingartner,Gerhard Zecha Conference proceedings 1970 D. Reidel Publishing Company

gloomy

書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics被引頻次




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics年度引用




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics讀者反饋




書目名稱Induction, Physics and Ethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

小爭吵

隱語

Comments on ‘Linguistically Invariant Inductive Logic’ by Ian Hackingt is well known that in Carnap’s theory confirmation measures are sensitive to the way in which families of predicates are generated out of sets of ‘primitive’ predicates partitioning these families. Hacking indicates agreement with Wesley Salmon that such sensitivity is objectionable. Unlike Salmon

頂點(diǎn)

愛花花兒憤怒

Statistics, Induction, and Lawlikeness: Comments on Dr. Vetter’s Paper he touches on within the confines of my comment. I must therefore limit my remarks to a few selected topics. Among the wealth of material offered by Dr. Vetter’s paper I have chosen two subjects for special consideration. They are (1) the relevance of mathematical statistics to a logician’s work on

Creditee

Simultaneity by Slow Clock Transport in the Special Theory of Relativityd in its bearing on the philosophical status of simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity (STR). Critical attention is focused on the claim, made in a 1967 paper by B. Ellis and P. Bowman (E & B), that Bridgman’s alternative to Einstein’s clock synchronization rule refutes the philosophical c

BRAND

歡樂東方

聯(lián)合

pacific