Titlebook: Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages; Alessandro Capone,Manuel García-Carpintero,Alessan Book 2019 Springer Internationa

嚴(yán)峻

書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages被引頻次




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages年度引用




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages讀者反饋




書目名稱Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

OTTER

FIN

注射器

Context-shift in Indirect Reports in Dhaasanac as well as in Uyghur (Sudo 2010). This chapter shows, on the basis of the collected data, that Dhaasanac has a fourth kind of monster that shifts person and temporal parameters optionally but does not shift the locative parameter in indirect reports.

隱語

現(xiàn)暈光

暫停,間歇

Immunity to Error through Misidentification and (Direct and Indirect) Experience Reportsf subject “I” advocated by Wittgenstein/Anscombe is correct. In fact, we show how this analysis can be made compatible with a Kaplanian account of first-person indexicals, by identifying the speaker in the context of utterance with the person who has access to the reported private experience.

GRIPE

Discourse Markers in Different Types of Reportingterns can be observed in terms of the frequency and grammatical features (tense, aspect, voice) of reporting verbs? (2) What kind of cross-genre differences can we observe with reference to reporting and the use of DMs in different types of reports (in terms of the frequency and functions of DMs, different report types, host units and p-contexts)?

值得

Accuracy in reported speech: Evidence from masculine and feminine Japanese languagetudy provides supportive evidence that distinctions between direct and indirect speech are less clearcut than traditionally believed and that these distinctions may be based on the functions and contexts in which each form is used rather than verbatim report for direct report and inclusion of the reporter’s voice in indirect report.

COST