找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: In Defense of Polemics; Ruth Amossy Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Polemical Discourse.Public Controversy.Public Sphere.Plu

[復制鏈接]
查看: 35640|回復: 39
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:17:01 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱In Defense of Polemics
編輯Ruth Amossy
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/463/462898/462898.mp4
概述Presents a ground-breaking take on the question of public controversy in the democratic space.Offers an innovating approach to rhetoric: how to achieve coexistence in dissent.Illuminates the regulatin
叢書名稱Argumentation Library
圖書封面Titlebook: In Defense of Polemics;  Ruth Amossy Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Polemical Discourse.Public Controversy.Public Sphere.Plu
描述.This book revisits the definition of polemical discourse and deals with its functions in the democratic sphere. It first examines theoretical questions concerning the management of disagreement in democracy and the nature of polemical discourse. Next, it analyses case studies involving such issues as the place of women in the public space, illustrated by the case of the burqa in France and public controversy in the media on the exclusion of women from the public space. The book then explores reason, passion and violence in polemical discourse by means of cases involving confrontations between secular and ultra-orthodox circles, controversies about the Mexican Wall and fierce discussions about stock-options, and bonuses in times of financial crisis..Although polemical exchanges in the public sphere exacerbate dissent instead of resolving conflicts, they are quite frequent in the media and on the Net. How can we explain such a paradox? Most studies in argumentation avoid the question: they mainly focus on the verbal procedures leading to agreement. This focus stems from the centrality conferred upon consensus in our democratic societies, where decisions should be the result of a pro
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Polemical Discourse; Public Controversy; Public Sphere; Pluralistic Democracy; Deep Disagreement; Rhetori
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85210-8
isbn_softcover978-3-030-85212-2
isbn_ebook978-3-030-85210-8Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
issn_series 1566-7650
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱In Defense of Polemics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics被引頻次




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics年度引用




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics讀者反饋




書目名稱In Defense of Polemics讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:04:01 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:40:34 | 只看該作者
Managing Disagreement in Democracies: Towards a Rhetoric of DissensusTo the extent that it appears like an often brutal clash of antagonistic opinions, polemics is indissolubly linked to disagreement.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:14:00 | 只看該作者
Public Controversy and Polemics: Some Attempts at DefinitionsIn public life as in daily life, verbal confrontations are numerous and names for designating them diverse. We speak about them in terms of debate, discussion, dispute, quarrel, controversy, or polemics to cite but the most common among them.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:42:09 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:17:21 | 只看該作者
Controversies and Polemics in Public Space “The Exclusion of Women” in IsraelIt is in the circulation of discourses that public controversy is constructed as a set of verbal confrontations on a social problem. Mono-managed discourses as well as verbal duels are drawn into the flow of statements that deal with a controversial subject.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:35:50 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:59:45 | 只看該作者
Verbal Violence: Its Functions and LimitsA discourse of passion, polemics is also accused of being a discourse of violence.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:23:38 | 只看該作者
Conclusion Coexistence in DissensusThe functions of public controversies.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:16:13 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 23:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
泸溪县| 伊宁县| 富川| 高邮市| 望城县| 嘉义市| 葵青区| 湾仔区| 磐石市| 仙桃市| 东海县| 汉中市| 仁布县| 兴化市| 武胜县| 徐水县| 都昌县| 韩城市| 辰溪县| 赤峰市| 响水县| 高唐县| 霸州市| 即墨市| 福贡县| 屏边| 繁昌县| 巧家县| 南开区| 金寨县| 长岛县| 五河县| 旌德县| 上高县| 年辖:市辖区| 镇康县| 云霄县| 沭阳县| 濉溪县| 闻喜县| 松原市|