Titlebook: Impressions of Empiricism; Godfrey Vesey (Honorary Director, Professor of Phi Book 1976 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publis

不朽中國

L. Jonathan Cohenas consequently limited the innovation and transparency impact of open data on respective economies and governments. While literature is replete with articles on barriers to open data exploitation and use; these studies are yet to examine how affordances of open data platforms could help to overcome

Ophthalmoscope

替代品

肌肉

都相信我的話

Locke and the Meaning of Colour Words,lour as grass and a different colour from the sky. If we shine a torch with a red bulb upon a white surface, we say that the surface looks pink although it is white. And if we suffer a bout of jaundice we (allegedly) claim that white things look yellowish to us, although they are not yellow, nor do

maculated

中古

The Status of Sense Data,one’s audience than to attempt variations on so threadbare a theme? And worse, what could be more unfashionable in the aftermath of Wittgenstein and Austin? My reasons for selecting this unpromising topic are twofold. First, the general theme of this series of lectures is empiricism. And whatever me

車床

New Phenomenalism as an Account of Perceptual Knowledge,All claims which go beyond the deliverances of the senses must, in the end, be justified by, and understood in terms of, relations holding between those claims and sensory data. Crucial to the Empiricist case, therefore, is an account of how perception can be a source of knowledge. How can sensory e

小歌劇

,Hume’s Impressions, have worked against each other from the beginning, in the first place because in the matter of writing Hume was an innovator — nobody before him had so successfully albeit unwittingly adapted French syntax to the writing of English-and-Scottish — and in the second place because on the grace of his

Gyrate

What is the Verifiability Criterion a Criterion of?,the other hand I am not sure that those who put it forward in its more liberal forms as a criterion of ‘factual significance’ or ‘literal meaningfulness’ were right in what they identified as the consequence of a sentence’s failing to satisfy it. What I want to argue for, in a somewhat reductionist