Titlebook: Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964; Partha Sarathi Gupta Book 1975 Partha Sarathi Gupta 1975 imperialism.labour.labour

intern

書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964被引頻次




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964年度引用




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964讀者反饋




書目名稱Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

微枝末節(jié)

,Reaction to the War and the Peace, 1914–22,ition the globe—efforts which had resulted in the war.. All social democrats who were supporting the war or, while opposing it, not actively promoting revolutions to overthrow their governments, were tarred by him with the imperialist brush.. Were British Labour supporters of the war motivated by im

conscience

,Imperial Economic Relations, 1922–29,nother general election, the newly elected leader, J. Ramsay MacDonald, formed the first Labour Government. After nine months’ experience of office, electoral disaster in November 1924 brought the Conservatives back to power for another five years.

長矛

,Imperial Political Issues, 1922–29,to prevent any one power from dominating the Continent. After 1919 the authorities were aware that the dominions were reluctant to get involved in a European war, and that Britain’s own ability to maintain a large defence establishment had been reduced.. Yet, at the Imperial Conference of 1923 it wa

ULCER

Lineage

誹謗

釋放

,Colonial Reforms: Blueprints and Realities, 1945–51,ecretary in the coalition ministry, and, among the M.P.s who had been returned, Creech Jones had the longest record of involvement in colonial affairs. By the beginning of the new parliamentary session of 1946, Creech Jones had succeeded George Hall. In July 1945, with a former chairman of the Party

忘恩負(fù)義的人

,Labour between Commonwealth and Europe, 1951–64,al elections, in both of which the Party yielded more and more seats to the Conservatives.. By 1964 the Colonial Empire had practically disappeared, leaving big question-marks as to what role, if any, Britain could play in relation to her former dependencies. That the question of a post-imperial rol

indecipherable