Titlebook: Hypocrisy in American Political Attitudes; A Defense of Attitud Timothy P. Collins Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s

emulsify

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-2364-9ize work from attitude research paradigms to formulate a series of quasi-algorithms for the quantification of logical inconsistency in individuals’ attitudes and attitude structures, with simple standard deviation calculations as the go-to method by which hypocrisy can be computed and, ultimately, analyzed.

APRON

過渡時期

Commemorate

What Is Attitudinal Hypocrisy and Why Does It Matter?,s a research idea, I lay out the path forward for the book’s approaches, with conceptualizations, operationalizations, and quantifications of attitudes, ideologies, and the hypocrisies that result from the collision thereof for American liberalism, conservatism, libertarianism, and populism. Because

finite

Psychological Dispositions, Political Orientations, and a Theoretical Framework of Ideological Difff political attitudes and ideologies. I then track and profile their interconnections and many multidirectional relationships, and compare them with the top-down “discursive superstructure” [Jost, Federico, & Napier, . (pp. 232–250), 2013]. After I reject the notion of any role being played by unidi

onlooker

Gay Is the New Black (but Black Is Still Black): The History and Current Trends of Attitudinal Hypotarian congruence, and the exploitation thereof by, among others, George Wallace to further subjugate Black Americans; the Vietnam War’s fracturing of the Democratic Party establishment at the expense of Hubert Humphrey and racial progress; the Reagan coalition of stated social authoritarianism at,

pacifist

ENACT

Having Your Cake and Eating It Too: Using Cognitive Dissonance to Explore Attitudinal Hypocrisy,ce literature and design a survey experiment in which Midwestern university students’ personal perceptions of and distastes for being accused of being hypocritical are tested in an induced compliance research procedure. The results suggest that, in contrast to previous research and the well-establis

Prologue

,What Good Is Cake If You Can’t Eat It? Prescriptions for and Conclusions About American Attitudinalnctions between social issues and economic issues are tough to overstate; what drove either category of issue hypocrisies was typically rooted in ideologically interactive effects and fundamental dispositional divisions. As a result, I discourage all who are even negligibly politically engaged from

愚笨

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14249-0ars, this introductory chapter illuminates an ironic history of attacking others for contradicting their political worldviews—for example, Alexander Hamilton’s amusement at Thomas Jefferson’s hypocritical push for doubling the size of federal territory and spending astronomical sums in the Louisiana