找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Bargaining Power; Health Policymaking Verna Smith Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Health Policy in England

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Mottled
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 22:10:33 | 只看該作者
Book 2018 rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement.?.The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to negotiate successfully with general practitioners.??.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:52:08 | 只看該作者
The Woman in the History of Healthg the comparative utility of single-approach theories that cite the influence of institutions, interest groups, the rational choices made by individuals, ideas or socio-economic factors, and a multi-theoretic approach, John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:17:30 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328144context and background to the policymaking is set out and the transformative intentions of policymakers revealed. The reader is allowed to see who was involved, what was done, how it was done and how it was implemented. Significant barriers which threatened the process, and enablers which supported it, are described and discussed.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:56:55 | 只看該作者
Health and Health Care in Britaine detailed story of the process to bring these to fruition are told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. The reader is allowed to see who was involved, what was done, how it was done and how it was implemented. Significant barriers that threatened the process and enablers that supported it are described and discussed.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:52:20 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:27:59 | 只看該作者
A Tale of Two Countries,lling comparative analysis of two case studies of pay-for-performance policymaking within general practice in similar countries, England and New Zealand, uncovers the drivers of each policymaking process and the reasons for differing outcomes. An innovative analytical framework is introduced, testin
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:55:24 | 只看該作者
,Analysing Public Policy: Does Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework Help?,structural and agency-based theories. However, the Framework has attracted much critical commentary, particularly for its neglect of institutional dynamics and the importance of history in policymaking processes. Its five central elements of policies, politics, problems, policy windows and policy en
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:05:56 | 只看該作者
A Comparison of the English and New Zealand General Practice Sub-Systems,the general practice sub-systems of the English and New Zealand national health services are compared and contrasting features identified in order to understand their differing processes of policymaking. Despite many similarities at their time of origin and in recent episodes of health policy reform
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:29:11 | 只看該作者
England: Context and the Quality and Outcomes Framework,. Negotiated between the British Medical Association and the state between 2001 and 2004, the detailed story of its design is told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. Drawing on insights from 12 qualitative interviews with participating or proximate policymakers in England, the
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:52:10 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 18:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
建德市| 梁山县| 原平市| 山阳县| 广宁县| 磴口县| 库伦旗| 兴和县| 登封市| 北碚区| 本溪市| 通海县| 新化县| 呼图壁县| 翼城县| 织金县| 饶河县| 内丘县| 小金县| 苍南县| 广汉市| 阿克苏市| 敖汉旗| 乌兰察布市| 普格县| 鄂温| 永吉县| 山东省| 洱源县| 科技| 长子县| 颍上县| 上思县| 垫江县| 巴楚县| 温泉县| 建瓯市| 乌拉特中旗| 且末县| 广元市| 康定县|