| 書目名稱 | Husserl and Analytic Philosophy |
| 編輯 | Richard Cobb-Stevens |
| 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/431/430011/430011.mp4 |
| 叢書名稱 | Phaenomenologica |
| 圖書封面 |  |
| 描述 | The principal differences between the contemporary philosophic traditions which have come to be known loosely as analytic philosophy and phenomenology are all related to the central issue of the interplay between predication and perception. Frege‘s critique of psychologism has led to the conviction within the analytic tradition that philosophy may best defend rationality from relativism by detaching logic and semantics from all dependence on subjective intuitions. On this interpretation, logical analysis must account for the relationship of sense to reference without having recourse to a description of how we identify particulars through their perceived features. Husserl‘ s emphasis on the priority and objective import of perception, and on the continuity between predicative articulations and perceptual discriminations, has yielded the conviction within the phenomenological tradition that logical analysis should always be comple- mented by description of pre-predicative intuitions. These methodological differences are related to broader differences in the philosophic projects of analysis and phenomenology. The two traditions have adopted markedly divergent positions in reaction to |
| 出版日期 | Book 1990 |
| 關鍵詞 | Aristotle; Edmund Husserl; Enzo Paci; Immanuel Kant; Ludwig Wittgenstein; Plato; concept; epistemology; logi |
| 版次 | 1 |
| doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1888-7 |
| isbn_softcover | 978-94-010-7342-4 |
| isbn_ebook | 978-94-009-1888-7Series ISSN 0079-1350 Series E-ISSN 2215-0331 |
| issn_series | 0079-1350 |
| copyright | Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 |
|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-6 19:18
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:23:55
