Titlebook: Hume’s Theory of Imagination; Jan Wilbanks Book 1968 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1968 David Hume.cognition.imagination.inter

Dislocation

,Hume’s Theory of Imagination in the Argument of His Philosophy of the Human Understanding (I): The ct reasoning; second, an attack on matter-of-fact reasoning; and third, a combined attack on both types of reasoning. In the present chapter, I shall examine each of these in order and shall indicate the manner in which Hume’s theory of imagination, as I understand it, enters into each of them.

做事過頭

現(xiàn)存

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0709-7David Hume; cognition; imagination; interpret; mind; philosophy; reason

dura-mater

Introduction,scope and limitations, takes a certain line of approach, exhibits certain emphases, has certain ends-in-view, etc. As an initial step in specifying the nature of this study, I shall indicate its central problem, i.e., that problem to the solution of which the solutions of the various other problems

肉體

antiandrogen

maculated

,The Generic Features and Basic Argument-Structure of Hume’s Philosophy of the Human Understanding,both . and ., the two major statements of his philosophy of the human understanding. In the present chapter, I shall attempt to show that the generic features of both these works are likewise identical. By “generic features” I mean the primary aims or goals and the basic, governing principles employ

輕彈

,Hume’s Theory of Imagination in the Argument of His Philosophy of the Human Understanding (I): The ct reasoning; second, an attack on matter-of-fact reasoning; and third, a combined attack on both types of reasoning. In the present chapter, I shall examine each of these in order and shall indicate the manner in which Hume’s theory of imagination, as I understand it, enters into each of them.

不確定

,Hume’s Theory of Imagination in the Argument of His Philosophy of the Human Understanding (II): Thethe evidence of external sense reveals a rather striking parallel, which many Humain commentators seem to have failed to observe. For just as Hume thinks that it is a singular and seemingly trivial property of the imagination which prevents us from becoming Pyrrhonian sceptics with regard to reason,

PAN

Conclusion,e central problem I raised at the outset of this work, viz., the problem of determining how Hume’s theory of imagination is related to, or involved in, the generic features and main lines of argument of his philosophy of the human understanding. I also believe that I have furnished (not only in Chap