Titlebook: Human Nature and Natural Knowledge; Essays Presented to Alan Donagan,Anthony N. Perovich,Michael V. Wedin Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing C

儀式

archetype

有組織

說(shuō)不出

larder

ethnology

flimsy

Two Motivations for Rationalism: Descartes and Spinozate and indeed personal nature. It is customary to classify both Descartes and Spinoza as rationalists, although the differences between them are far from peripheral or insignificant. So far as concerns the underlying motivations of their inquiries, the divergence between them is particularly sharp and unequivocal.

NAV

Spinoza and the Ontological Proof heading “ontological proof.” It is clear from these preliminary remarks that the term “proof” is being used in the wide sense of argument and not in the narrow sense of valid or successful argument. Nor will I be concerned with the validity of those arguments which qualify as ontological.

obsolete

Book 1986quick humor, her love of talking, her passion for philosophy - all combine to make her inevitable. Marjorie Grene cannot be missed or overlooked or undervalued. She is there - Dasein personified. It is an honor to present a Festschrift to her. It honors philosophy to honor her. Professor Grene has s

PATRI

Adequate Causes and Natural Change in Descartes’ Philosophy bodies. My method, then, is indirect. I will be looking at these problems, and at the ways Descartes handles them, as symptoms; and I will be arguing that they arise from an underlying and thoroughgoing commitment to the conception of causality articulated in the adequacy principle.