Titlebook: How and Why States Defect from Contemporary Military Coalitions; Kathleen J. McInnis Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

Silent-Ischemia

The Netherlands in Afghanistan,nstruction Team from Uruzgan province without a follow-on mission planned and the subsequent decision to contribute a police training mission in northern Afghanistan. Given that ISAF was, at the time, so controversial that the mere notion of an extension of the Uruzgan mission led to the collapse of

抵押貸款

Further Applying the Theoretical Framework,nal Command-South coalition and assesses whether it fits the criteria of a collapsed coalition outlined earlier in these pages. It finally turns to a variety of other cases to determine whether the analytic framework also explains continued coalition participation.

MAZE

ifferent kinds of strategies that nations may employ to defeThis book identifies contemporary military coalition defections, builds a theoretical framework for understanding why coalition defection occurs and assesses its utility for both the scholarly and policy practitioner communities. Drawing up

textile

,The Puzzle of Coalition “Defection”,y to participate—is largely a function of alliance and international pressures to remain engaged. As such, this chapter lays out the analytic puzzle of contemporary coalition defection, why it is so hard for analysts to detect, and the methodology this book employs to analyse how and why states defect from contemporary coalitions.

身心疲憊

creatine-kinase

Canada in Afghanistan,th key decision-makers at the time, were it not for the “pull” of Canada’s alliance relationships and their influence on the overall Canadian foreign and national security policy community, a real possibility exists that Ottawa might not have deployed the follow-on mission to Kabul at all.

microscopic

The Netherlands in Afghanistan, the Balkenende government, it is somewhat remarkable that the Netherlands decided to re-engage in . capacity. However, as this chapter ultimately concludes, the pull of Dutch alliance relationships within NATO was key in motivating the Rutte government to find a way to become re-engaged in ISAF as expeditiously as possible.

esoteric

Book 2020 Ultimately, it concludes that coalition defection is prompted by heightened perceptions of political and military risk.? Yet the choice of how to defect— whether to completely withdraw forces or instead find another, less risky way to participate—is largely a function of international and alliance pressures to remain engaged.

不可侵犯

植物群

f political and military risk.? Yet the choice of how to defect— whether to completely withdraw forces or instead find another, less risky way to participate—is largely a function of international and alliance pressures to remain engaged.978-3-319-78834-0