Titlebook: Honest Errors? Combat Decision-Making 75 Years After the Hostage Case; Nobuo Hayashi,Carola Lingaas Book 2024 T.M.C. Asser Press and the a

Mercurial

出血

鐵塔等

Devastation and Forced Evacuation: The Actors and Their Motives Norway and destroy their homes. This event was later adjudicated before the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg in the case against . Alfred Jodl. Although Jodl claimed that it was Josef Terboven who gave the order, Jodl was found guilty and executed in 1946. The following year, Rendulic w

CLOT

Repetitions

The Adjudication and Findings of Finnmark’s Devastation Charge in on trial for acts of devastation not justified by military necessity, in the Finnmark region of Northern Norway. In his defence, Rendulic justified the acts on the grounds that the devastation of the territory and the forced evacuation of the region were permissible on the basis of being militarily

蔓藤圖飾

The Genesis and Significance of the Law of War “Rendulic Rule”d early and notorious application in the post-Second World War prosecution of . Lothar Rendulic known as the . case. A tribunal of American judges drawn from civilian US legal quarters famously acquitted Rendulic for devastation carried out in the erroneous belief that Soviet forces were pursuing hi

lactic

The Limits of Honest Judgment: The Reasonable Commander Test and Mistake of Factnd the defence of mistake of fact in international criminal law (ICL). This chapter analyses the link between the reasonable commander test and the mistake of fact defence. After an outline of the legal reasoning in ., it examines the origins, purpose, and operation of the reasonable commander test

公理

Admire

Empathy at War: The Distinction Between Reasonableness and the Reasonable Military Commander Standar which a reasonable military commander would have acted. The difference is that only the second question compels a person assessing a given state of affairs to engage in empathetic perspective-taking. Accordingly, this chapter argues that the reasonable military commander test is a legal device whic

Compatriot

Drone Warfare, Civilian Deaths, and the Narrative of Honest Mistakes resulting from the US military’s drone campaigns in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. We argue that the narrative of “honest errors” unjustifiably excuses those involved in these killings from moral culpability, and reinforces long-standing, pernicious assumptions about the moral superiority