找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: History of Rationalities; Ways of Thinking fro Luca Sciortino Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

[復制鏈接]
查看: 25455|回復: 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:50:02 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱History of Rationalities
副標題Ways of Thinking fro
編輯Luca Sciortino
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/428/427587/427587.mp4
概述A comparative analysis of the different notions of ‘ways of thinking’ introduced by philosophers.A guiding thread running through historical epistemology in an attempt to unify the researches of its a
圖書封面Titlebook: History of Rationalities; Ways of Thinking fro Luca Sciortino Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li
描述.Over time, philosophers and historians of science have introduced different notions of ‘ways of thinking‘. This book presents, compares, and contrasts these different notions. It focuses primarily on Ian Hacking’s idea of ‘style of reasoning‘ in order to assess and develop it into a more systematic theory of scientific thought, arguing that Hacking’s theory implies epistemic relativism. Luca Sciortino also discusses the implications of Hacking’s ideas for the study of the problem of contingency and inevitability in the development of scientific knowledge.
出版日期Book 2023
關鍵詞Historical epistemology; way of thinking; Ian Hacking; styles of reasoning; relativism; contingency; incom
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24004-1
isbn_softcover978-3-031-24006-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-24004-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱History of Rationalities影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱History of Rationalities影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱History of Rationalities網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities被引頻次




書目名稱History of Rationalities被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities年度引用




書目名稱History of Rationalities年度引用學科排名




書目名稱History of Rationalities讀者反饋




書目名稱History of Rationalities讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:20:56 | 只看該作者
epistemology in an attempt to unify the researches of its a.Over time, philosophers and historians of science have introduced different notions of ‘ways of thinking‘. This book presents, compares, and contrasts these different notions. It focuses primarily on Ian Hacking’s idea of ‘style of reasoni
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:08:14 | 只看該作者
,Notions of the Concept of ‘Ways of Thinking’: From Classical Historical Epistemology to Kuhn, notions capture different channels through which objectivity becomes possible, it will be possible to group them in the same genus within historical epistemology and say that all these frameworks provide a ‘history of objectivity’.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:34:39 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:50:28 | 只看該作者
,Notions of the Concept of ‘Ways of Thinking’: From Hacking to Daston and Galison,toricize Kant. I shall also show that there are substantial convergences between the styles project and Daston and Galison’s study on objectivity. Finally, following Williams’s account of truth and truthfulness, I shall argue that styles of reasoning are ways of telling the truth and ways of looking at the world.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:26:54 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:31:54 | 只看該作者
,Developing the ‘Styles Project’: Towards a ‘Theory of Styles of Reasoning’,of reasoning. Finally, I shall argue that there are other ways of thinking that differ from styles of reasoning in the sense of Hacking. What I consider a relevant difference is that only styles of reasoning have strong techniques of self-authentication, techniques that are intrinsic to their forms of reasoning.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:31:48 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:21:57 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:55:19 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24004-1Historical epistemology; way of thinking; Ian Hacking; styles of reasoning; relativism; contingency; incom
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 02:14
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
中西区| 广昌县| 泾源县| 柘荣县| 红桥区| 临洮县| 宁乡县| 盐源县| 桃源县| 林芝县| 麻栗坡县| 枣庄市| 高碑店市| 鹿邑县| 仪征市| 东城区| 竹山县| 东辽县| 刚察县| 吉首市| 随州市| 淮南市| 五台县| 新宁县| 汤原县| 陇南市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 如东县| 广汉市| 进贤县| 青海省| 沙坪坝区| 美姑县| 长岭县| 汽车| 永顺县| 天柱县| 肃北| 潢川县| 巴彦县| 台南市|