Titlebook: Hegel and the History of Political Philosophy; Gary K. Browning Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1

cardiopulmonary

Hobbes, Hegel and the Modern Self,t from one another. Peperzak and Siep have rightly emphasised the opposition between Hobbes’s naturalism and Hegel’s idealism.. The major texts by Hobbes and Hegel on political theory, . (1651) and the . (1821), express divergent conceptions of philosophy and political association. Nonetheless Hobbe

exhibit

,Stirner’s Critique of Hegel: , and the Egoistic Exorcist,epresents what Toews has styled ‘the transformative translation of Hegelian terms’.. The radicalism of Stirner’s critique of Hegel’s standpoint, coupled with his creative development of Hegelian notions of alienation, historical and social forms of conflict and the intrinsic freedom of the human ego

hardheaded

, Stirner and Hegel: The Theory of History and the History of Theory,as detachable in previous interpretations, share a community of purpose and character. In design and practice . is a work devoted to the history of theory. The character of the project upon which Marx and Engels are engaged in . is clearly conveyed in the subtitles of its two volumes, ‘Critique of M

faction

蜿蜒而流

jeopardize

,Lyotard’s Hegel and the Dialectic of Modernity,tomised what Lyotard consistently takes to be the ‘other’ of his own fast-moving thought. Hegel’s otherness is seen to be his rationalist essentialism against which Lyotard’s anti-essentialist and contrary standpoint is defined. Hegel’s philosophy is presumed by Lyotard to consist in the reflective

Prologue

感染

提煉

CRUC

Gary K. Browningagination and reason so that intellect is generated. This inclusion of concrete activities entails that singular knowledge and perfection, rather than aiming solely at the cognition of metaphysical truths, must focus on the complete individual, including ethical and political conditions.