Titlebook: On Arms Control; Robert O’Neill,David N. Schwartz Book 1987 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1987 Arms Contr

Culmination

ARY

farewell

Pros and Cons of Unilateral Disarmamented by victors on vanquished Powers, like that imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles, it is doubtful whether any very substantial reduction (as distinct from limitation and regulation, of which there are examples) of armaments has been brought about by treaty in modern times. Unilateral disa

設(shè)施

The Scope for Super Power Agreementslks will lead to agreements or even to valuable exchanges of ideas. But potentially they are the most important formal arms control negotiations of the postwar years for they raise directly, as between the two super powers, who alone are able to determine it, the question of the future of the centra

Collision

正式演說(shuō)

wall-stress

The Moscow Agreements and Strategic Arms Limitationtions of the post-1945 era. Previous negotiations have been of two kinds. Either they have been sterile polemical exchanges, lacking in seriousness — like the canvassing of rival schemes for general and complete disarmament. Or, in cases where serious discussion and bargaining have taken place, they

Default

Arms Control and World Orderer is desirable and feasible. It is inevitable that this should be so, for to raise questions about the quality and quantity of arms that should exist in international society, about who should possess them, where they should be deployed, for what objectives and in what ways they should be used, is

expansive

Rethinking Non-Proliferationerence will be held in Geneva in May 1975 in circumstances of growing scepticism not only about the Treaty but also about the wider endeavour to control the spread of nuclear weapons, of which it is part.

小官