Titlebook: Hart‘s Legal Philosophy; An Examination Michael D. Bayles Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1992 H.L.A. Hart.Hart.interpret.mo

Awkward

書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy被引頻次




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy年度引用




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy讀者反饋




書目名稱Hart‘s Legal Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Spina-Bifida

Hart vs. Dworkin,former student and successor as Professor of Jurisprudence at Oxford University. Because of the large literature on their views contributed by various authors, people are apt to overlook the many interchanges between Hart and Dworkin themselves on a variety of topics. Here is a brief chronology.

HERE

The Legislation of Morality,5.4.2). This chapter considers another of the four topics about the relations between law and morals that Hart distinguishes (., 1–4), namely, using criminal law to enforce a society’s morality. The last chapter takes up Hart’s views on the moral criticism of law, which he developed only for criminal punishment.

晚來的提名

The Nature of Rules,For Hart, a legal system is a system of rules. Consequently, characteristics of rules are central to his theory. Two features of rules are at the center of Hart’s theory. The first is the basis for their existence. The second is their indeterminacy or open texture.

Fibrin

978-90-481-4208-8Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1992

譏諷

rectum

膠狀

行業(yè)

A Critique of Austin, the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries the work of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin developed the positivist analysis of law as well as a utilitarian normative jurisprudence or theory of legislation. In response to criticisms, during the twentieth century some philosophers of law develope

完成才能戰(zhàn)勝