Titlebook: Hans Christian ?rsted and the Romantic Legacy in Science; Ideas, Disciplines, Robert Michael Brain,Robert S. Cohen,Ole Knudsen Book 2007 S

針葉樹

hermetic

,?rsted And The Rational Unconscious,sition provoked by the very idea of the unconscious, especially in scientific circles: “The concept of the unconscious has long been knocking at the gates of psychology and asking to be let in. Philosophy and literature have often toyed with it, but science could find no use for it.” From the outset

鼓掌

Popcorn

affect

,?rsted’s Presentation Of Others’—And His Own—Work,ence’ understood as a body of knowledge pertaining to a canonical set of fundamental phenomena. Yet if by ‘science’ one understands the flesh-and-blood, words-on-paper world of ongoing human activity that produces such knowledge, then ?rsted’s contemporary significance looms much larger. It turns ou

Statins

,?rsted, Ritter, And Magnetochemistry,search for such an influence began one century earlier. In the very beginning of the 19th century, after the invention of Volta’s pile and before the discovery of electromagnetism, several researchers were looking for effects of magnets on chemical reactions. One of the reasons behind this search wa

Nerve-Block

Sad570

,Hans Christian ?rsted’s Spiritual Interpretation Of Natural Science,re influential in shaping ?rsted’s understanding of science and religion, suspecting that it was Schelling and not Kant who was important here. I will do some of that; in fact, I now think both Kant and Schelling were significant influences, although in different ways. But what I found myself really

我沒有強(qiáng)迫

The Spiritual In The Material,ful. Most books got no comment, but the year before he had found Frank Newman’s . (an autobiographical novel of religious doubt) excellent; and this certainly tells us something about Darwin’s state of mind at the time. It also indicates the difficulty of fitting the eminent ?rsted into some kind of

兒童