找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Handbook of the Sociology of Morality; Steven Hitlin,Stephen Vaisey Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2010 Altruism.Ameri

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 憑票入場
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:37:22 | 只看該作者
What Does God Require? Understanding Religious Context and Moralityight from wrong. This chapter reviews research that identifies the distinctive contributions of religion with relation to moral beliefs and behaviors. We begin by briefly reviewing why religion is unique. Why does it hold a distinctive relationship with morality and what drives this relationship? Ne
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 21:41:45 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 00:25:28 | 只看該作者
The Creation and Establishment of Moral Vocabulariesims and understandings are organized internally (in claims and the actions of moral entrepreneurs) and externally (how internal moral vocabularies intersect with the larger societal dynamics). This framework seeks to strike a theoretical balance between recognizing the essential agency of morally-re
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:46:32 | 只看該作者
The Cognitive Approach to Morality the development of collective consensus on various issues and also the long- and middle-term changes in moral feelings. The theory avoids the flaw of making moral feelings a mere emanation of socio-cultural contexts or alternatively of a contextual processes. It overcomes the opposition individuals
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:51:09 | 只看該作者
Four Concepts of Moralitys. Durkheim’s holist epistemology frames a moralizing sociology in which moral questions have scientific answers, derivable from knowledge of the objective mechanisms of social integration and solidarity. The hierarchical epistemology of Marx’s thought is centered on a view of society as a strongly
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:43:09 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 18:18:43 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 23:33:01 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 01:21:18 | 只看該作者
Class and Moralityements, whether about self and other, practices and ways of living. I conclude by calling for further research which transcends the divide between sociological and normative or evaluative treatments of class and morality.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 06:12:18 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 19:11
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
陵川县| 乌鲁木齐县| 义马市| 浦江县| 汝城县| 沂源县| 邻水| 安康市| 高州市| 临夏县| 青海省| 临洮县| 佛坪县| 邵东县| 新建县| 富源县| 卢湾区| 清镇市| 翁源县| 威宁| 灵璧县| 宜州市| 三江| 石城县| 美姑县| 绍兴市| 宁武县| 诸暨市| 永寿县| 玉屏| 崇礼县| 家居| 海盐县| 兖州市| 佛教| 和平区| 泰顺县| 阿尔山市| 清河县| 襄城县| 大城县|