Titlebook: Handbook for the Historiography of Science; Mauro L. Condé,Marlon Salomon Living reference work 20230th edition Historiography of Science

Prostatism

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227774(1725–1799), one of the members of the group of . gathering around Jean Le Rond d’Alembert when, during the 1750s, he was editor of the .. Combining a tireless historical work with strong philosophical views derived from one of the most preeminent members of the French Enlightenment movement, Montuc

疲勞

GIST

delusion

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0202-2ly introductions to technical works, pursuing the need to upgrade the reputation of mathematics (rather than delving into its past technical developments) by tracing its roots in biblical or mythological literature. As the field established itself, its historiography turned to biography, then consid

秘方藥

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08439-3entific knowledge and of all historical narrative. Shapin’s historiographical perspective is an attempt to displace the boundaries of scientific practice established by traditional historiography. These displacements entail a commitment to the central theses of meaning finitism, postulated by the St

沖突

思想

mighty

浪費物質

Self-Help-Group

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3500-6ue that there is a parallel story to tell about the relationship between historiography, including the historiography of science, and the philosophy of history. This chapter puts historiography, including the historiography of science, in conversation with the philosophy of history. I contend that t