Titlebook: Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems; Conceptual Framework Leonard Adelman,Sharon L. Riedel Book 1997 Springer Science+Business

Nebulous

k requirements? Is thesystem easy to use? Is the knowledge base logically consistent? Doesit meet the required level of expertise? Does the system improveperformance? .The authors have produced a handbook that will serve two audiences: atool that can be used to create knowledge-based systems(practitioners, de978-1-4613-7829-7978-1-4615-6171-2

AXIOM

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58017-8e integrated into the knowledge-based system development plan, are used to coordinate the many elements of the evaluations. By coordination, appropriate scheduling, and anticipating problems, early evaluation planning and management can facilitate efficient and effective use of evaluation resources

Immortal

艱苦地移動

ir widening use. While there have been manysuccessful applications of knowledge-based systems, some applicationshave failed because they never received the corrective feedback thatevaluation provides for keeping development focused on the users‘needs in their actual working environment. This handboo

ordain

Ingredient

BROTH

Framework for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems, or her own set of evaluations that is tailored to the development model being used. The framework will help the evaluator decide what evaluation issues to address, when in the development life cycle the issues should be addressed, what evaluation methods to use for what issues at which stage, and who should supply the evaluation data.

GROSS

Insubordinate

grenade

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24217-6 introduced to quantify the nonlinear contributions in the lungs in healthy is then employed in a theoretical analysis to show that the values are changing in case of disease. The results indicate that the proposed method and index are useful for clinical classification of viscoelastic properties in the lungs.