Titlebook: Hearing — Physiological Bases and Psychophysics; Proceedings of the 6 Rainer Klinke,Rainer Hartmann Conference proceedings 1983 Springer-Ve

Afflict

A Comparison of Mechanical Nonlinearities in the Cochleae of Man and Gerbil from Ear Canal Measuremeour understanding of the evoked biomechanical responses of the cochlea just as we have come to understand and use its electrophysiological responses. Here we compare and contrast ear canal manifestations of cochlear biomechanics in human and gerbil, and consider some parallels with the round window

monologue

URN

Ingrained

On Peripheral Processing in Human Hearingipherally, i.e. within the cochlea and without neural lateral inhibition, some very carefully collected physiological data (e.g. Sellick et al., 1982a) have recently revealed that the frequency selectivity of the basilar membrane is sharper than was previously assumed. These results also agree quite

紅潤(rùn)

吸引力

The Future of the Law of the Seaher is to present new experimental results of our own. As to the first aspect, the reviewing can only be brief in the allotted space. More extensive reviews are: for cochlear physiology Dallos (1981), for non-vertebrates Wiederhold (1976), for intracellular electrical responses Weiss (1983).

玉米棒子

能夠支付

Future of the Microcomputer in Education of individual nerve fibers and hair cells (Russell and Sellick, 1978; Crawford and Fettiplace, 1980) in the auditory organs of several species show extremely sharp selectivity for particular frequencies. There is currently much debate over the mechanisms that determine this selectivity, or tuning,

溺愛(ài)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21204-0s, the efferents are capable of both modifying auditory nerve tuning (Kiang .., 1970) and reducing acoustic distortion products attributed to changes in cochlear mechanics (Mountain, 1980; Siegel & Kim, 1982). It is difficult to interpret such complex effects without first understanding the post-syn

acheon

Future of the Multinational Enterprisee structural features of the cochlea. Considerations of gross impedance configurations (studied by several groups in recent years: Kurokawa, 1965; Johnstone et al., 1966: Honrubia and Ward, 1969; Strelioff, 1973; Honrubia et al. 1976; Cannon, 1976; Geisler et al., 1977) may now be refined by incorpo