找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: ;

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: TOUT
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:17:59 | 只看該作者
,Executive Struggles in Germany 1870–1909,ts role was limited mainly to responding to the individual states’ plans for regulating Gypsies within their borders. While there were periodic efforts to create legislation on a national scale, these never met with success in the prewar period. Instead, the development of Gypsy policy took place mo
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:56:11 | 只看該作者
,Creating a State of Exception: 1910–1913,utive authorities faced an increasingly challenging international situation which made expulsion more difficult, and despite their admonitions, they faced tensions and problems in implementing their policies on a local level. Those placed in the category of Gypsy felt increasingly challenged as well
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:12:19 | 只看該作者
,The Courts, 1861–1914,ption as their primary mode of dealing with them. The judicial system served both as a key player in the campaign against Gypsy populations and a hindrance to its implementation. Ultimately, the inability of the judicial system to lay the groundwork for the complete denationalization of Gypsy popula
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:35:02 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:56:46 | 只看該作者
Stroke for the Advanced Practice Clinician This process of criminalization, however, often proved more complicated than executive authorities intended. The definition of Gypsies offered by executives in their regulations was amorphous. The resulting confusion of the police led to incomplete and unsatisfactory implementation of executive dir
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:43:37 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69864-4aly. The regulations separated Gypsies and “those who acted like them” more sharply from the indigent traveling population. In Germany, unlike in Italy, policy grew increasingly focused on removing Gypsies’ claims to German citizenship as well as nationality. As in Italy, those who “behaved like Gyp
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:32:01 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:35:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1241-0ughly “modern” and bureaucratic in nature. Gypsies ended up existing in a virtual no-man’s land — as “nationality” trumped “citizenship” over the course of the 20th century, as both Gosewinkel and Arendt argue that it did, Gypsies were stripped of their claims to citizenship and nationality, belongi
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:32:31 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:22:54 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 02:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁波市| 穆棱市| 九江市| 汉源县| 平安县| 娄烦县| 多伦县| 法库县| 隆安县| 光山县| 平南县| 雅安市| 南岸区| 泾源县| 龙胜| 都兰县| 侯马市| 怀安县| 元朗区| 札达县| 百色市| 应用必备| 遂川县| 康马县| 桐城市| 新绛县| 凯里市| 云和县| 沁源县| 丹凤县| 法库县| 黄冈市| 遵化市| 沐川县| 延寿县| 怀集县| 平利县| 黔南| 涞源县| 莱芜市| 陆川县|