找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: ;

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: TOUT
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:17:59 | 只看該作者
,Executive Struggles in Germany 1870–1909,ts role was limited mainly to responding to the individual states’ plans for regulating Gypsies within their borders. While there were periodic efforts to create legislation on a national scale, these never met with success in the prewar period. Instead, the development of Gypsy policy took place mo
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:56:11 | 只看該作者
,Creating a State of Exception: 1910–1913,utive authorities faced an increasingly challenging international situation which made expulsion more difficult, and despite their admonitions, they faced tensions and problems in implementing their policies on a local level. Those placed in the category of Gypsy felt increasingly challenged as well
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:12:19 | 只看該作者
,The Courts, 1861–1914,ption as their primary mode of dealing with them. The judicial system served both as a key player in the campaign against Gypsy populations and a hindrance to its implementation. Ultimately, the inability of the judicial system to lay the groundwork for the complete denationalization of Gypsy popula
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:35:02 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:56:46 | 只看該作者
Stroke for the Advanced Practice Clinician This process of criminalization, however, often proved more complicated than executive authorities intended. The definition of Gypsies offered by executives in their regulations was amorphous. The resulting confusion of the police led to incomplete and unsatisfactory implementation of executive dir
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:43:37 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69864-4aly. The regulations separated Gypsies and “those who acted like them” more sharply from the indigent traveling population. In Germany, unlike in Italy, policy grew increasingly focused on removing Gypsies’ claims to German citizenship as well as nationality. As in Italy, those who “behaved like Gyp
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:32:01 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:35:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1241-0ughly “modern” and bureaucratic in nature. Gypsies ended up existing in a virtual no-man’s land — as “nationality” trumped “citizenship” over the course of the 20th century, as both Gosewinkel and Arendt argue that it did, Gypsies were stripped of their claims to citizenship and nationality, belongi
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:32:31 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:22:54 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 05:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
且末县| 巨鹿县| 韶山市| 华宁县| 旌德县| 礼泉县| 郧西县| 宁城县| 嘉黎县| 拉孜县| 仪征市| 任丘市| 琼海市| 湖州市| 隆安县| 依安县| 马鞍山市| 开化县| 皋兰县| 桑日县| 沂南县| 高阳县| 卫辉市| 崇文区| 永嘉县| 澄城县| 嵊泗县| 永兴县| 新源县| 荣昌县| 平山县| 浏阳市| 南和县| 林西县| 文水县| 长葛市| 西安市| 安新县| 乌拉特后旗| 临洮县| 汝州市|