Titlebook: ;

煩人

監(jiān)禁

The Tension Between Phenomenology and Existentialism in ,o read his critical presentation of Saint Teresa, his characterization of “the Latin races” as “healthy minded,” his lack of interest in the history of religions—along with his explicit rejection of “the ‘all is vanity’ state of mind” as implicit criticisms of Santayana.

衍生

,Some Key Moments in Santayana’s Philosophy of Transcendence and How These Relate to James,tween “psyche” and “spirit” along with his coining of the term “l(fā)iterary psychology,” all allow him to develop a critical perspective on James that also preserve the latter’s great insights in psychology.

性學院

有助于

剝皮

Transcendence and the Historical Imagination in Santayana and James,of history—to become synthesized into a single philosophical perspective. Unlike Hegel, who thought that there existed a single historical synthesis for each philosophical era, however, Santayana argues that his synthesis expresses his own vital philosophy, and that it was not the only possible synt

充氣女

漂白

,Some Key Moments in Santayana’s Philosophy of Transcendence and How These Relate to James,how Santayana reacts to it in a letter of his own. This chapter begins by examining how the Palmer letter relates to Santayana’s implicit allusions to James in Interpretations, something James clearly perceived. I then move on to examine some of the ways in which Santayana continues to use this appr

Missile

,Santayana’s Philosophical Conversion: Liberty in Exile,n and how these relate to his published works. I further add a philosophical perspective provided by the Puerto Rican philosopher, Rafaél Arrillaga Torréns, for it represents some indirect evidence in support of Santayana’s claim that his vital philosophy relates to his Spanish background. When Jame

lethargy

,Philosophy as Form of Life and Santayana’s Criticisms of James, concern. It led James in the direction of psychologism, something Santayana vigorously rejects. If James turns to a modified, light-hearted theism in order to justify common perceptions, Santayana turns to an important analogy that he draws from his personal involvement with architecture. Both chos