Titlebook: ;

怒目而視

窗簾等

有害

Standardization of CCTs Without Gender Equality,n this case, in particular, feminist and gender-related research—was marginalized, as were the experts in the institution who carry that knowledge. Therefore, the World Bank’s evidence-based approach led to certifying a thin version of CCTs, minus any goals for altering gender relations or outcomes.

名義上

and the ,: Translation with Innovations Rooted in Exclusionary Institutional Legacies,recipe promoted by the World Bank, Peruvian and Bolivian policy entrepreneurs translated it and adapted it to local ingredients embedded in strong exclusionary institutional legacies. The outcome of translation is therefore the exclusion of gender equality goals from CCT design and a reinforcement o

hermetic

expeditious

Die Local- und Staatsverwaltung gender relations and the role played by the World Bank in promoting and diffusing CCTs, fading gender equality goals in CCTs have yet to be explored and explained. This chapter underscores why the book is therefore a good case for understanding changing gender equality goals when these are institut

abnegate

Erratum to: Das ?ffentliche Rechtnalysis of the two cases demonstrates how in the process of cooking from existing and new ingredients, policymakers were able to include gender equality goals in the design of . while their Brazilian counterparts were not quite so successful. The chapter begins with a brief contextual and historical

faucet

Ethno-Nationalismen zu Sowjetzeiten, Bank as part of a series of anti-poverty actions. After briefly explaining the historical and institutional context of the World Bank in social development and gender, I demonstrate that the World Bank weakened gender equality goals in two significant ways. First, international policy entrepreneurs

Bereavement

母豬

Die politischen Parteien in Deutschlandnted. It then explores the differentiated explanations and variations built out of the theoretical framework and compares them to the empirical findings. In doing so, it lays open the implications of the inclusion or not of gender equality goals in social policies, stressing the limits and the poten