Titlebook: ;

negation

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-79讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

討好女人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89240-9amined the record of the fifty years from 1919 to 1969 to support the thesis that the use or threat of limited naval force, otherwise than as an act of war, still remained one of the techniques employed by governments to secure advantage or to avert loss in their international relations. As a pionee

逢迎白雪

Die einzelnen Speditionszweige, or grasp the slipperiness of its floating substance. Gunboat diplomacy is equally familiar and no less amorphous. Its scope and nature are not easily discerned: they resist the simplicity of a single, . definition. Instead the subject must be enveloped and, step by step, isolated from its fluid and

緯度

同義聯(lián)想法

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13046-8onsider how far their previous words or actions indicate their readiness to employ this expedient. Obviously this cannot be a comprehensive survey. . lists over a hundred navies and, even if all those with good reasons for not venturing beyond their own territorial waters are excluded, too many rema

Vldl379

Vldl379

Allgemeiner kaufm?nnischer Gesch?ftsverkehr to establish that the concept of limited naval force is capable of definition, that its employment can be discerned and analysed in recent history, that the likely pattern of future developments need not exclude an expedient for which the resources and, in a lesser degree, even the doctrines are av

Debate

Introduction,pt by one government to exert an unwelcome influence on the policy of another. It is often applied to situations involving no threat or use of naval force, sometimes even to disputes in which the only pressures employed are economic or diplomatic.

Goblet-Cells

有偏見(jiàn)