Titlebook: ;

dissent

Introduction,individualistic, materialist and competitive creed that negates the values associated with green social and political ideas. It seems to me that if green politics is to be analysed, it cannot be done on the basis of accepting what passes for received notions of rationality. Hence my recourse to a di

協(xié)議

Discourse, Power and Environmental Policy,lustrate such advantages and limitations in the context of an analysis of some environmental issues, notably including ozone depletion, transport policy and alternative energy policy in the United Kingdom.

閃光東本

Rational Choice Theory and Environmental Policy,for environmental policy, since rational choice theory has grown from obscurity in the 1950s to a theory that promises (or threatens) to dominate political science in the late 1990s. By 1992 almost 40 per cent of articles in the . were based on rational choice methods (Green and Shapiro 1994: 3). It

EWE

Science, Politics and Environmentalists1,al discussion and science. A key part of my efforts to do this will be to look at the relationship, to one another, of agents of the environmental discourse, particularly scientists involved in ecology and environmental pressure groups. This helps us understand how, in general terms, current debates

費(fèi)解

逢迎春日

Health and Materialism,ving health is refined. This may not be a perfect measure of health. For example, longer life expectancy does not always involve an extension of high-quality life. Nevertheless, life expectancy is a concept that is easily measurable and about which there is little argument over interpretation. To th

多余

并置

A Green Alternative,lysis, on the perceived self-interest of the contented middle-class majority of the electorate. This suggests that society is divided between the contented and an underclass who are alienated from the system that is seen to exist for the contented, but in which they see no point in engaging. The mor

Ceramic

graphy