Titlebook: ;

PACT

駕駛

Veslem?y Rydland,Svitlana Kucherenko by many as the best hope for conserving biodiversity while also supporting sustainable, inclusive growth. Evidence is growing that illuminating the ways in which people depend on nature for their well-being can motivate efforts that improve both (Guerry et al. 2015; chapter ., this volume). Creativ

寬宏大量

Long-Term Conflict and Environmental Change,e all complex, “wicked” problems that lack an easily identifiable and generalizable solution (DeFries and Nagendra 2017). Most of these problems are large in scope as they cover multiple geographies, sectors, and stakeholders. They also involve collective action problems: individuals make independen

Fierce

Wolfram Schwenk: Water as an open system,imit the catch in a fishery that seems in danger of collapsing? And if we take these actions, . should we reduce the threatening activity? Answering these questions is fascinating, but no easy matter. It requires consideration of scientific, economic, legal, and political issues, not to mention the

裁決

Risk in Nuclear Power Operation,f forests and water have been linked since the thirteenth century (Andréassian 2004). Thus it is no surprise that government payment programs for ecosystem services are vital and longstanding, especially when it comes to water-related ecosystem services.

乞討

However, this development can also cause the loss of natural capital and biodiversity, with forests cut down, grasslands paved over, and wetlands filled. To guide development in a way that furnishes a net benefit to society, government regulations in the United States often require that projects—bo

cluster

J. T. McMullan,R. Morgan,D. W. Hughesopically minded individuals, nongovernmental organizations, and private companies can contribute powerfully to conservation through their voluntary actions (Fig. 8.1). This chapter presents two examples of voluntary conservation: (1) the Amazon Region Protected Areas program (ARPA) in Brazil, and (2

分開(kāi)

巡回

不可侵犯

New Women Dramatists in America, 1890-1920ped the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol would meaningfully address deforestation, credits were granted only for afforestation and reforestation. No credit was provided for reducing rates of deforestation. This policy gap provided the impetus for development of the Reducing Emission