Titlebook: ;

獸皮

言外之意

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57521-1ption from the science of astronomy” (Heath),. advising astronomers “to replace observation by speculation” (Neuge-bauer).. Others have found in it nothing worse than a critique of sterile methodological empiricism and a plea for the mathematization of astronomical theory: “Plato is not objecting he

者變

CHAR

Neue Techniken — Veraltete Gewerkschaften? false as well as true belief but not false as well as true knowledge. In that dialogue Plato used the distinction to draw the boundaries between rhetoric, whose main aim and use at the hands of Gorgias and his pupils was to gain power by inducing belief, and . or . whose main aim and use at the han

septicemia

雜色

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85985-3tion between an . for, and a . of, the soul. He establishes different adequacy criteria for each, and introduces a way of appraising the explanatory value of a model. Second, to show that Plato’s criticism of Simmias’ model of the soul as harmony — as a blending of the elements of the body — is unfa

有權(quán)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97022-0egard to Plato’s contribution to it. The ancient tradition as well as many modern scholars and historians agree that Plato’s contribution to mathematics was decisive, especially in problems of methodology, systematization and foundation of mathematics and its emancipation from experience.. For them,

生意行為

Neue Technologien — neue M?rkteguments” (ο?? δι? τρω??ν λ?γοι), having the form . The same class of arguments is also mentioned once in the Preface of Ammonius’ commentary, . and once in Philoponus’ commentary. on the .. Limited though the evidence may be, scholars have already proposed plausible interpretations concerning the or

diathermy

Ljuba Kokalj,Guido Paffenholz,Petra Moog of concentric spheres — introduced by Eudoxus of Cnidus (. 350 B.C.) — had upon the study of celestial phenomena. According, however, to O. Neugebauer this theory was “no more than a clever philosophical toy”. since “no systematic planetary theory existed before the time of Apollonius or Hipparchus

FISC

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90169-5rse of the eighteenth century. The reorientation toward modern science, the gradual liberalization of Greek thought and the political radicalization that sprang from it, especially in the half century before the outbreak of the Greek War of Independence in 1821, make up an intellectual configuration