Titlebook: ;

ACRO

書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre被引頻次




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre年度引用




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre讀者反饋




書目名稱Granville Sharp‘s Uncovered Letter and the Zong Massacre讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Axon895

Per Jensen,Bo Algers,Ingvar Ekesboowed the massacre, including the insurance trial initiated by the Gregson syndicate (the slave-traders) and Sharp’s efforts to use the information from the hearing for an appeal of the trial decision to instigate a murder trial. With reference to a broad range of scholarship on the . incident, this

符合國情

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00705-2e relationship between different pieces of primary evidence relating to Sharp’s writing on the . case. This chapter delineates who was the intended recipient of the British Library document (as opposed to the letter’s addressees, the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty), and who owned it (it passed

把手

吹牛者

cringe

cringe

孤僻

The Provenance of the British Library Document,e relationship between different pieces of primary evidence relating to Sharp’s writing on the . case. This chapter delineates who was the intended recipient of the British Library document (as opposed to the letter’s addressees, the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty), and who owned it (it passed

柱廊

Cabinet

The Historical Significance of the British Library Document, collectors, the British Museum, and finally the British Library. It also advances several possible explanations for why the manuscript letter was inappropriately bound in a compiled volume of printed pamphlets and ends with a discussion of the other way in which the . case has remained hidden in te