Titlebook: ;

MINT

磨坊

創(chuàng)作

Meditate

Identifying and Influencing Key Stakeholdersl and theoretical research towards the cultural and ideological processes that underlie formal institutions of power such as the state. Conceived as ‘intellectual and moral leadership’, the concept hegemony points the analysis of power away from pure coercion and towards the maintenance of ideologic

頂點

Introduction: Reading Gramsci Today,ion of books, articles, dissertations and college courses on Gramsci and his ideas in the last three decades signifies a gradual assimilation of his work into the mainstream of the Arts and Social Science academy in Europe and America. Arguably, the ‘Gramsci phenomenon’, as one observer has called i

放棄

狗窩

Intellectuals and Political Leadership,rative with a start and a beginning) that we have come to expect in the writings of major political thinkers. As I mentioned in the Introduction, the fragmentary and unfinished character of his notes requires that their interpretation is heavily dependent on the kind of questions being asked. The ap

繁重

State, Civil Society and the Politics of Consent,statement. In fact, the concept was developed in different ways throughout his notes, sometimes serving as a link to connect different phenomena, at other times as a critical device to redefine particular concepts. Any one textual definition of hegemony, then, is likely not to exhaust the range of u

AMOR

,The Party as the ‘Modern Prince’,al and political divisions in favour of popular participation. We have also examined the, analytical framework formulated around the concept hegemony that he believed was necessary to properly understand the contemporary conditions of bourgeois rule. In his writings on the strategy and form of the r

丑惡

Hegemony and the Legitimation of the State,ination. Hegemony is believed to explain the ‘supremacy of one group or class over others in society by reference to the proliferation of ideas and values that legitimate its power. Gramsci’s popularity outside of Italy has rested on the argument attributed to him that the predominant form of power