Titlebook: Governing New European Democracies; Jean Blondel,Ferdinand Müller-Rommel,Erik Sootla Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

沒有希望

conjunctivitis

Ministers and the Role of Civil Servants in Cabinet Decision-Makingeen ‘politicians’ and ‘a(chǎn)dministrators’ has been controversial in many countries across the world and has even led to the suggestion that civil servants may subvert democracy and assume power. Public administration specialists have indeed advanced different models of what the relationship can be. Thu

Reclaim

Ministers and Cabinet Decision-Makingking process — the ministers — as well as to those among the ministers who can be expected to play an even greater part, the ministers of finance and the prime ministers. The role and influence of ministers of finance and of prime ministers will be analysed in the next two chapters; this chapter con

紀念

Finance Ministers and Cabinet Decision-Makingve decision-making body. The reality is, of course, different. In the previous chapter, we saw that there were substantial differences in the extent to which the ministers themselves were involved in cabinet decisionmaking, even if there was apparently more collegiality in the cabinets of the countr

環(huán)形

緩和

Conclusionentary-cabinet system of government in the early 1990s and have maintained a high standard of achievement ever since. The odds were against it — as they have been elsewhere, for instance in the countries of the CIS. They were against it because the success of the cabinet system entailed simultaneous

重力

The Rules and the Operating Procedures in Cabinetdetail: they are taken here as the point of departure of the analysis. It is sufficient to note that there was manifest eagerness, among the countries of the region, to become quickly associated with a Western Europe from which they had been separated for decades: In political terms, Western Europe meant the parliamentary system.

antidepressant

宇宙你

結(jié)構(gòu)

Mathematical Logic and Its ApplicationsShleifer 1997; Stefan 2004, Vass 1993). This book constitutes an attempt to fill this gap, by analyzing the characteristics of cabinet decision-making in ten Central Eastern European democracies: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia. Romania and Bulgaria.