Titlebook: Governing Global Production; Resource Networks in Jeffrey D. Wilson Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limite

NAIVE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38925-7oped to service demand for coal and iron ore from Northeast Asia’s growing steel industries. As a result of their mutual interdependence, the fates of these two industries became intertwined, coming to form a set of functionally-integrated global production networks (GPNs) that connect Asia’s mining

遭受

peak-flow

Keisuke Takahashi,Lauren Takahashioordination, achieved through institutionalised patterns of firm-firm and state-firm cooperation, was a critical factor that both facilitated high-speed growth in Japan’s steel industry, and shaped the characteristics of resource networks the industry would develop to secure its supply of minerals f

殘暴

人類學家

W. T. K. Henderson,G. B. Thomasry, it adopted a ‘resource nationalist’ approach to its mining sector. This new approach involved a series of aggressive state interventions, which aimed to reduce Japanese control and increase the share of value generated in the production networks that was being captured in Australia. These state

門閂

Solidification/Liquid State Processes, membership at the mining end of the resource networks, and to ultimately re-establish Japanese control by promoting international competition between mineral suppliers in Australia, Brazil and Canada. As this new Japanese strategy gained pace during the 1980s, it set off an acrimonious struggle bet

malign

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2520-2ises and emerge as the world’s dominant steel producer. It was also of considerable importance to the Asia-Pacific resource networks, as it shaped the characteristics of a Chinese production networking strategy that would have major consequences for how the resource networks were governed.

消極詞匯

otic-capsule

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5537-1s interact, negotiate and bargain over the arrangements within production networks. The governance structures resulting from these bargaining patterns prove central in determining how value is distributed between the states and firms in global industries.

嚴厲批評