Titlebook: Governing Future Technologies; Nanotechnology and t Mario Kaiser,Monika Kurath,Christoph Rehmann-Sutte Book 2010 Springer Science+Business

Compass

完成才能戰(zhàn)勝

The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles: Contribution to a Normalisation of the Science/Society Relationshi relation to scientific and technological progress. It has often been deplored that ethics fall helplessly behind technical progress and fall well short of fulfilling the great societal expectations of providing moral guidance. The rapid pace of innovation is seen as the main reason why ethical deli

Lacerate

逗它小傻瓜

連鎖,連串

Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnologylections and deliberations contextualize them as future technologies. Because nanotechnologies are currently inchoate, even those stakeholders who recognize an interest in them often operate with only loosely formed and sometimes ill-conceived expectations of them. Even so, such projections are esse

用手捏

Which Ethics for (of) the Nanotechnologies?ve? If we ask this question seriously we need to look carefully at all those things that constitute the ethical concerns within the field, including the identity of the ethics itself and its relationship with technology. Should it be an accompaniment at all? The relationship of a companionship betwe

Sad570

Lure of the “Yes”: The Seductive Power of Technoscienceand particularly difficult to answer with respect to the current status of nanotechnology. This technoscientific enterprise is marked on the one hand by nearly unanimous endorsement and on the other hand by an apparent absence of power. The following reflections serve to address this challenge by su

鋪?zhàn)?/a>

可忽略

Steffen Eschinger,Annette Hochstrahstionship to the so-called nanodiscourse has not yet been examined in depth. Questions, which social groups can be identified, who is taking part in this discourse, and who is excluded are still underrepresented. In order to establish this new field of research and innovation, scientists try to activ

Osmosis