Titlebook: Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991; Anthony D’Agostino Book 1998 Anthony D?Agostino 1998 cold war.communism.foreign policy.history.Policy.r

積聚

書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

平淡而無(wú)味

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302136by now and the result was always the same: they would send some delegation to him to beg him to change course and he would finesse the whole thing. He was convinced that they lacked the capacity to force anything on him, and told the press specifically after the July plenum that he was not at all frightened by them.

depreciate

Console

978-1-349-14407-5Anthony D?Agostino 1998

食品室

CHOIR

CHOIR

連鎖,連串

,‘Acceleration of the Perfection’, 1985–87,ew General Secretary had consolidated his power? We had to make policy with this man in mind — if, that is, he was truly in charge. In 1953 we had thought it was Malenkov and it turned out to be Khrushchev. Was it really Gorbachev now? When would we know? In truth, there was no adequate answer to th

花費(fèi)

Gorbachev Bound: The Emergence of the Ligachev Opposition, and political leadership had pulled the whole Politburo along. There was a consensus that in order for progress to be made the superannuated Brezhnev coterie would have to have its ranks refreshed under a new leader. The Andropov appointees were swept along with the programme of ‘Acceleration’ beca

才能