Titlebook: Gold Mining and the Discourses of Corporate Social Responsibility in Ghana; Nathan Andrews Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

arrogant

BET

Gold Mining and CSR: Responsibility to Whom and for What,he chapter describes as an act that has resulted in the elevation of corporate knowledge, power, and capital over the social order. The background information provided in this chapter sets the tone for the rest of the book but it also helps to understand the genealogy of CSR, the corporation itself,

Allowance

,“We Need Social Licence to Actually Mine and We Believe Communities Are Part of What We Do”: Conteseated for themselves through the CSR discourse. This is done by examining a variety of information from corporations’ websites, sustainability reports, and personal interviews conducted with several stakeholders. Andrews finds that the enactment that occurs via the discourse of corporate citizenship

rods366

NOTCH

,“A Woman Can Also Speak Out”: Gendered Perspectives on Responsibilization,ific perspectives around CSR and mining ramifications in Ghana. The chapter intends to not only show how CSR constitutes its responsibilized object (i.e. the corporation), but also expose the direct impact of this enactment on people’s lives, especially vulnerable populations. Andrews uses feedback

藥物

,“There Is No Yardstick to Measure [Our Performance] With”: A Global Movement for Institutionalizingpractice’, and how such manifestation of the CSR discourse institutionalizes unaccountability. The chapter uses the UN Global Compact and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as examples of existing normative mechanisms that facilitate the enactment of the global corporation that i

PALSY

,The Bigger Picture: Implications for ‘Engendering’ CSR, De-responsibilization and Re-responsibilizace. The idea of ‘engendering’ CSR is based on the discussion in Chapter . and is primarily drawn from women respondents’ own self-identified notions of how to make things better. Secondly, Andrews reflects on the role of the state in an era of responsibilization, with an understanding that the proce

幼兒

fodlder

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98815-3eated for themselves through the CSR discourse. This is done by examining a variety of information from corporations’ websites, sustainability reports, and personal interviews conducted with several stakeholders. Andrews finds that the enactment that occurs via the discourse of corporate citizenship

affluent

The Value of Birth Cohort Studiesewmont Ahafo Development Foundation (NADeF). The goal is to showcase how such an award-winning CSR activity facilitates the enactment of a corporation that is concerned about the long-term development of affected communities. Andrews also explores what he regards as the five ‘sticky’ elements that u