Titlebook: God, Suffering and Solipsism; Clement Dore Book 1989 Clement Dore 1989 existence of god.god.philosophy of religion.theology

臭名昭著

美色花錢

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1493-6K’s case for solipsism is a formidable one. But, as we shall see, it can be overthrown by some of the considerations set out earlier in the book.

stroke

,A Modal Argument for God’s Existence,Consider the following argument for God’s existence.

CANON

低三下四之人

Parodies,The supremely perfect being of the last chapter is, of course, identical with the maximally great being of Chapter 1. Hence, the former would be necessarily absolutely great, i.e. no other supremely perfect being is possible.

Arresting

A Proof of the Logical Possibility of God,At this point, it may look as if . is much more credible than proof ., since . does not commit its defender to proving that God’s existence is logically possible. But this is mere appearance: . provides us with a model for such a possibility proof, as follows.

Bereavement

小卒

Gerontology

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6672-8o abolish suffering and a perfectly good being . abolish it; hence, no being is both omnipotent and perfectly good, i.e. a maximally great being does not exist.’ In view of ., . and ., we have reason to believe that this argument is unsound. However, as we shall see, it is no simple matter to discov

一致性