Titlebook: God, Mind and Logical Space; A Revisionary Approa István Aranyosi Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

英寸

,: Lindsay Anderson and Thorold Dickinson,istence of God, due to Anselm of Canterbury. The solution to various problems that arise will be the view that God is identical to Logical Space, a view I call .. The plausibility of Logical Pantheism will further be argued for in the remaining chapters, based on some historical as well as theoretic

Bother

下船

友好關(guān)系

Eosinophils

種子

Introductional debate or discussion we say something to the effect that a certain position on a certain issue is possible or makes sense for someone to hold — it is in logical space, we say. We need not agree with that position, but we consider it to make sense, or to be consistent logically. In such contexts w

警告

What Is Logical Space? monograph dedicated to the notion of logical space itself, except when it is taken as synonymous with the space of possible worlds. Wittgenstein, who introduced the phrase to philosophy in the ., never defines logical space, yet we get a clear and intuitive idea of what it is supposed to be, namely

聰明

“Life” in Logical Spacee debates in the public arena. Debates between theists and atheists who are not philosophers many times end up in overheated and bitter quarrels, because they seldom devote some thought to the very notion of existence. A good example for the debates in the philosophical arena is the issue of whether

讓步

手銬

Logical Spillovertransistence or transistent causation, the idea of . is that the way things stand within one region, ., will force us to draw conclusions about the entire canonical logical space that . is part of. This phenomenon will be most useful when R is the actual region or actual world, because our knowledge