Titlebook: God in One Person; The Case for Non-Inc A. Richard Kingston Book 1993 A. Richard Kingston 1993 Christianity.god.Jesus

JAMB

acquisition

RADE

ABIDE

POWER

Does All His Teaching Befit Divinity?orded teaching of Jesus, and indeed it is within the context of a profound appreciation of that teaching in general that we must nevertheless make fairly severe criticisms of some particular aspects of it. Admittedly, it may seem petty-minded to focus entirely on the mistakes or disputable utterance

Engulf

Emmenagogue

Why then the Special Focus on Jesus?evelation, clearly entails that no historical faith can claim to be the sole and divinely sanctioned repository of all theological truth and religious duty. Consequently, any dogmatic claim to absolutism should be replaced by a recognition of pluralism, a recognition that, to some extent at least, t

oxidize

An Attractive and Viable Faith but also improper, in that it may suggest that the reasoned argument of the preceding chapters is being supplemented by a propagandist recommendation of such faith. The real reason, however, for this brief defence of the spiritual viability of unitarianism is to counter the apparently widespread su

揉雜

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94728-6ef in God, not just in God as ‘Three-in-One’, which is widely questioned or rejected. Hence, despite the fact that the book is predominantly an attempted repudiation of the doctrine of God incarnate, it is appropriate, if not imperative, to preface this with a relatively short statement of the groun

decode