Titlebook: God and Ultimate Origins; A Novel Cosmological Andrew Ter Ern Loke Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Kalam.Tho

揭穿真相

The Question of Ultimate Origins,s regarding this issue, demonstrate that philosophical arguments are capable of yielding knowledge about reality that are more epistemically certain than scientific discoveries, and explain that science and philosophy can complement one another in the quest for the answer. I argue that belief in a d

祝賀

下級

內(nèi)閣

Is There a Causal Loop Which Avoids a First Cause?, open and closed loop, and explain that a dynamic loop and an open loop does not avoid a First Cause. I note that a static closed loop cosmological model has been proposed by Gott and Li (. 58:023501–1, 1998), and that we do not have adequate evidence for thinking that such a loop exists. I discuss

大漩渦

Did the Initial State of Reality Begin to Exist Uncaused?,esponse to Oppy (Faith and Philosophy 27:61–71, 2010, 2015), I develop an argument for the Causal Principle which shows that, if the initial state of reality began to exist uncaused, then certain events would begin to exist uncaused around us, which is not the case. Therefore, the antecedent is not

hegemony

obeisance

The Conclusion of Our Quest,The conclusion that such a Creator exists is not based on ignorance, but on reasons explained in previous chapters. While the progress of science would generate further scientific explanations for physical reality, it would not replace the need for such a First Cause to explain the existence of phys

Free-Radical

penance

Andres Kuusk,Mait Lang,Joel Kuuske and show that there is no adequate evidence for any of the cosmological models which propose an infinite temporal regress. I note that Craig has offered two philosophical arguments against an infinite temporal regress (the argument for the impossibility of traversing an actual infinite and the arg

outer-ear