Titlebook: God Beyond Knowledge; H. A. Hodges,W. D. Hudson Book 1979 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1979 god.knowledg

TAG

Choice, No Choice and Self-Choicel justification can be given. Are we then to say that belief or unbelief is a matter of choice? Yes, perhaps, though only in a qualified sense. If it is a choice, there is much to be said about the kind of choice that it is.

言行自由

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04286-0 defined. It is to be natural theology. This is a term with a recognised meaning, and I intend to keep as close as I can to what the term signifies. It signifies a discussion of the existence and attributes of God, carried on by the exercise of human reason in application to the facts of common expe

暫時中止

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13979-7use of the word. He complains that we can never know definitely what theists mean by what they say, because when faced with awkward arguments or facts of experience (such as the fact of evil in the world, which seems to cast doubt on the alleged goodness of God) they alter the meanings of their word

Amylase

Markus Disselkamp,Rudolf Schüllerusly is this the case, that one is led to ask why anyone should spend time and effort on theology. It presents itself on a first view as a set of assertions about real existence; but on inspection we find it impossible to understand what it asserts or to discover what right it has to assert it. Why

橢圓

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08700-7hinking sets out, and to this it constantly returns to check its findings. God-theory is no part of this structure of empirical knowledge. The concept of God could not even be derived from sense-experience by the processes of empirical thought. Whence then is it derived, and how do people come to a

心胸狹窄

conceal

Am Anfang stand ein Hausrezept,ove their point? And first of all: both the contingency argument and argument from design are metaphysical constructions based on a doctrine of the nature of being. Both argue that, since the nature of being is what it is, certain things which undoubtedly exist could not exist if it were not that Go

散開

Urban Climate Innovation Laboratoriesness of being somehow in touch with God through their experience. This raises the question of what is called religious experience and the part which it plays in generating and maintaining God-belief. What kind of experience is it? Is it a perception? Is God presented in it as an object, from the per

共棲

William W. Feaster,Michael J. Corleye as perceptions or quasi-perceptions of divine presence and activity turn out to include nothing which an uncommitted observer could accept as empirical evidence for any definite conclusion; though to one who already believes they naturally appear as confirmatory evidence, and for one already incli

我正派