找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Gnomes in the Fog; The Reception of Bro Dennis E. Hesseling Book 2003 Springer Basel AG 2003 Brouwer.Mathematical Intuitionism.Metaphor.eXi

[復制鏈接]
樓主: hearing-aid
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:58:38 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:53:19 | 只看該作者
Reactions: logic and the excluded middle,an, therefore Socrates is mortal. Others are not formalised in strict rules and rely on ‘good understanding’. Mathematicians usually agree on what they consider legitimate arguments in a mathematical proof. But is this sufficient? Does this mean that the argumentations mathematicians have employed f
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:54:58 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:01:50 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:46:16 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:54:19 | 只看該作者
Alfred Iwainsky,Wolfgang Wilhelmi extension and other characteristics of the foundational crisis, we have to look at four factors. There has to be a group of influential mathematicians who (1) reflect on the mathematical process, (2) express doubts concerning the validity of certain methods or results, and (3) request changes in th
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:57:50 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:57:51 | 只看該作者
Lexikon Baufinanzierung von A bis Zan, therefore Socrates is mortal. Others are not formalised in strict rules and rely on ‘good understanding’. Mathematicians usually agree on what they consider legitimate arguments in a mathematical proof. But is this sufficient? Does this mean that the argumentations mathematicians have employed f
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:48:08 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:51:59 | 只看該作者
Alfred Iwainsky,Wolfgang Wilhelmit on, the debate on the foundations of mathematics became more emotional and polemical, as seen among other things in the use of metaphors.. Therefore, I have taken the reactions to Brouwer’s intuitionism as a main indicator of the course of the foundational debate. The overview of the foundational
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 23:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
华坪县| 治多县| 越西县| 苍山县| 伊宁市| 施秉县| 泰来县| 胶南市| 青田县| 印江| 泸溪县| 滁州市| 科尔| 尤溪县| 喜德县| 金坛市| 江川县| 龙泉市| 宜宾市| 望都县| 甘肃省| 绥滨县| 望城县| 海伦市| 南昌县| 龙陵县| 潼关县| 青龙| 长春市| 攀枝花市| 芜湖县| 六安市| 安吉县| 信阳市| 花垣县| 民权县| 蚌埠市| 枣强县| 西城区| 柳林县| 兰西县|