Titlebook: Global to Local: Ecological Land Classification; Thunderbay, Ontario, Richard A. Sims,Ian G. W. Corns,Karel Klinka Book 1996 Kluwer Academi

慢跑鞋

Introduction — Global to Local: Ecological Land Classificationms) for the purposes of land resource management. Since ecosystems themselves are not easily defined in practical terms, ELC is likewise not a trivial concept. Nonetheless, ELC is a prerequisite for ecosystem management and the conservation of biological diversity simply because ecosystems must be d

BRAND

Land Classification and Ecosystem Classificationnto similar and dissimilar pieces — sectoral ecosystems — at various scales, in the interests of admiration and understanding. The recognition of land/water ecosystems in a hierarchy of sizes provides a rational base for the many-scaled problems of protection and careful exploitation in the fields o

AGGER

Multi-Scale Ecosystem Analysis into ecosystems is understanding the factors that control ecosystem size at various scales in a hierarchy. The relationships between an ecosystem at one scale and ecosystems at smaller or larger scales must be examined, in order to predict the effects of management. Multi-scale mapping is helpful i

同位素

Tailor

The ITE Land Classification: Providing an Environmental Stratification of Great Britaincation is to produce classes that match the patterns that are present by helping to define clear boundaries. The more appropriate the analysis and data used, the better the classes will fit the natural patterns. The observation of inter-correlations between ecological factors is the basis for interp

transient-pain

Spatial Scale-Dependent Policy Planning for Land Management in Southern Europeing approach, which is designed to address increasing land degradation problems in southern Europe. Seven important processes are identified (land abandonment, devegetation, intensification in agriculture, global climate change, accelerated soil erosion, increasing water demands, urbanisation) and p

沒有希望

A Spatial Hierarchical Framework for the Co-Management of Ecosystems in Canada and the United Statestories in many parts of North America. Paralleling this has been an evolution in those hierarchical frameworks guiding the development and application of classifications. However, resource management agencies continue to grapple with the dilemma of applying multiple classification and inventory temp

一個攪動不安

Development of a Multilevel Ecological Classification System for the State of Minnesotay organized into six levels following the United States Forest Service structure. The upper four levels are being developed State-wide by an interdisciplinary group from several agencies. Geographic Information Systems approaches are being used to overlay and integrate existing data. The first two l

Banquet

TIA742