找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Global Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage; A Neo-Institutional Bronwyn Winter,Maxime Forest,Réjane Sénac Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applic

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: DEIGN
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:21:25 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:25:32 | 只看該作者
Historical Institutionalism and Same-Sex Marriage: A Comparative Analysis of the USA and Canada, contrast to the state-by-state struggle for same-sex marriage that occurs in the USA. At the same time, recent court rulings in the USA demonstrate the impact of national-level judicial decision-making. Comparing two countries with strong courts highlights the factors that condition judicial impact in this policy?area.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:47:37 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:03:54 | 只看該作者
The Globalization of LGBT Identity and Same-Sex Marriage as a Catalyst of Neo-institutional Values: to the globalized world of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) identities and increasing jurisdictions where same-sex marriage has become legal. As such identities globalize and begin to be institutionalized, a series of counter-reactions has followed and subsequently produced unexpected outcomes.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:50:30 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:18:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35127-4sm demonstrates that a federalist structure was essential for same-sex marriage in Brazil, while the unitary composition of Chile provides fewer policy avenues for LGBT rights. Using Political Opportunity Structure, we then demonstrate how the judicialization of LGBT rights in Brazil led to success for same-sex marriage.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:57:35 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1245-9ocialist government presents same-sex marriage law as being in historical continuity with the ideals of the Republic, defining marriage as a republican institution embodying equality and secularization, while the Spanish socialist government has used marriage as a source of political polarization and proof of modernity.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:38:48 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:43:55 | 只看該作者
Ion Beam Surface Layer Analysisessitating a referendum in 2015 to legalize same-sex marriage. By contrast, in Australia marriage is not a constitutional matter, but the Marriage Amendment Act (2004) explicitly requires that marriage be between a man and a woman. At the time of writing, same-sex marriage remains illegal there.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:06:36 | 只看該作者
A Tale of Two Congresses: Sex, Institutions, and Evangelicals in Brazil and Chile,sm demonstrates that a federalist structure was essential for same-sex marriage in Brazil, while the unitary composition of Chile provides fewer policy avenues for LGBT rights. Using Political Opportunity Structure, we then demonstrate how the judicialization of LGBT rights in Brazil led to success for same-sex marriage.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 13:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
龙泉市| 改则县| 郸城县| 高台县| 勃利县| 喀什市| 上饶县| 金华市| 黄浦区| 台北市| 淅川县| 开原市| 宁河县| 仪陇县| 乌审旗| 凤冈县| 本溪市| 雷山县| 任丘市| 昭平县| 黎平县| 马尔康县| 漳平市| 五峰| 尤溪县| 三台县| 民乐县| 东山县| 石台县| 紫金县| 河池市| 黄石市| 蓝山县| 甘孜县| 固原市| 保德县| 乐清市| 桃江县| 山东省| 柏乡县| 高碑店市|