Titlebook: Global Governance and Diplomacy; Worlds Apart? Andrew F. Cooper (Associate Director and Distingui Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division

CORD

https://doi.org/10.1007/b118954don to New Delhi to Beijing use public diplomacy as an instrument of statecraft. Rare is the government today that does not require its diplomats and other professionals to understand, engage and influence global publics. Significantly, public diplomacy is no longer confined to the realm of statecra

Fierce

非秘密

激怒某人

Global Governance: Challenges to Diplomatic Communication, Representation, and Recognitionndidate for the endangered species list (Cooper, 1997: 174), and Zbigniew Brzezinski’s quip in 1970 to the effect that if foreign ministries and embassies ‘did not already exist, they surely would not have to be invented’ is frequently quoted (James, 1980: 933; Hamilton and Langhorne, 1995: 232; Hoc

共同給與

Panacea

廢止

Externalize

A Twilight Zone? Diplomacy and the International Committee of the Red Crosseart of conflict and in the shady halls of government, but rarely more widely or more publicly than that. Its objective was simple: to minimise human suffering by persuading warring parties to allow it access to zones of conflict, so that it might provide medicine and emergency relief with impunity.

Foreknowledge

Research Institutes as Diplomatic Actorsed who influence and act within their respective boundaries to impact upon the way states, both individually and collectively relate to one another. The multiplicity of actors within the state and the transnational character that they have begun to represent are critical to the analysis of this volu

Hamper