Titlebook: Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa; Brexit, ‘Development Mark Langan Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

贖罪

書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa被引頻次




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa年度引用




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa讀者反饋




書目名稱Global Britain and Neo-colonialism in Africa讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

enterprise

alleviate

悠然

Global Britain and UK Aid Policy Towards Africa,of monies to incentivise Brexit trade deals—and to secure a migration compact with Rwanda. Moreover, in the case of Ethiopia, it underscores the use of UK aid monies to secure benefits for UK firms even in situations of civil war. The chapter argues that there is clearly a ‘realist’—or more accurate

Fermentation

Global Britain and Development Finance in Africa,. The chapter argues that it is useful to conceptualise such UK interventions in terms of neo-colonialism and global coloniality. ‘Global Britain’ via its development finance seeks to maintain political influence in relation to African executives. It also seeks to ensure that UK interests continue t

省略

省略

Working-Memory

Contesting Global Britain: Considering African Agency,n considers material forms of power, and how African officials may utilise new initiatives such as the African Union’s African Continental Free Trade Agreement to counter UK influence. The chapter then turns to ideational sources of African resistance to the Global Britain project. It considers oppo

EXCEL

Adenocarcinoma

Bestimmung der hydraulischen Parameter empire. This chapter examines how the (African) Commonwealth has been central to UK elites’ sense of potence and relevance on the international stage. It makes clear that a paternalistic ‘mission civilisatrice’ has motivated contemporary British politicians including Blair, Cameron and May. It also